Ahh, science
I always love when scientific discussions of morality and religion stray away from simplistic and familiar territory. I also always love Blogging Heads' weekly Science Saturday. This last week's was an ass-kickingly awesome discussion* between Joshua Knobe and Paul Bloom about morality.
Young babies apparently show preference for 'helping' behavior over 'neutral' behavior, and prefer 'neutral' over 'hindering' behavior. Kids are more likely to believe that things exist for a reason (lions exist there so that people can see them in the zoo and enjoy them). All good stuff, and there's tons more covered in the course of the discussion.
Even more satisfying is that the two Heads, whenever they come up with a disagreement, decide they should set up experiments to see which position is more accurate. No one ever does that in the political Bloggin Heads dialogues, and certainly no one ever does that in the general realm of moral or religious discussion.
*I have never and will never use the term 'diavlog.'
Young babies apparently show preference for 'helping' behavior over 'neutral' behavior, and prefer 'neutral' over 'hindering' behavior. Kids are more likely to believe that things exist for a reason (lions exist there so that people can see them in the zoo and enjoy them). All good stuff, and there's tons more covered in the course of the discussion.
Even more satisfying is that the two Heads, whenever they come up with a disagreement, decide they should set up experiments to see which position is more accurate. No one ever does that in the political Bloggin Heads dialogues, and certainly no one ever does that in the general realm of moral or religious discussion.
*I have never and will never use the term 'diavlog.'
